Re: [CR]relacing used hubs

(Example: Framebuilders:Brian Baylis)

From: "Howard Darr" <hdarr@localnet.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, <marcus.e.helman@gm.com>
References: <OFAF3F215E.6FB19D0E-ON85257279.004A8BEE-85257279.004C226C@gm.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]relacing used hubs
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:51:33 -0500
reply-type=original

I would be interested in an answer. The person who taught me to build wheels thought that once a hub was marked it had to be built that way. If not the flange large or small would have a high probability of cracking. Using a file would not help.

Urban legend or true. Enquiring minds would like to know.

Howard Darr
Clymer 5 below here PA


----- Original Message -----
From: marcus.e.helman@gm.com
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 8:51 AM
Subject: [CR]relacing used hubs



>I am going to lace up some wheels on a pair of used Campagnolo Record
> hubs. There are marks around the spoke holes that indicate how the hub
> was laced before. I prefer to lace my wheels so that when looking at the
> left flange of the rear wheel from the left side of the bike, a head-down
> spoke at the top of the flange points toward about 10:00 on the rim. This
> hub was laced the opposite way: a head-down spoke on the left flange would
> point at 2:00.
>
> Question 1: Is it better to relace the way the hub was laced before, or is
> it ok to switch directions?
> Question 2: the spokes must have been pretty tight before, since some of
> them have dug up little ridges. Should I file or sand those ridges down?
>
> Best regards,
> Marcus Helman
> -2 degrees in Huntington Woods, MI