Re: [CR]Keirin NJS

(Example: Framebuilding)

In-Reply-To: <25198466.3487571171133128401.JavaMail.root@vms125.mailsrvcs.net>
References: <25198466.3487571171133128401.JavaMail.root@vms125.mailsrvcs.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:16:43 -0800
To: Classicrendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
From: "joel metz" <magpie@blackbirdsf.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]Keirin NJS


At 12:45 -0600 02.10.2007, <leonarddiamond@verizon.net> wrote:
>As to the original question of the threading/size of NJS components,
>take a look at the (ot) Campy 1991 catalog which states:
>
>"special threading for hub,bb,crankarms,pedals and headsets must be
>used to guarantee interchangeability with other existing equipment"
>on the Record Keirin NJS approved group page.
>
>It doesn't appear that the NJS stuff has any super special
>qualities, rather it is done to:
>1- restrict equipment to the local manufacturers
>2- create an even playing field among competitors

considering that keirin is the basis for gambling enterprises, ive always been of the impression that #2 is the primary concern. its the same reason keirin frames are only built by a specific method, by a small, approved group of framebuilders. same reason why chains and toestraps have to be thrown away after a certain number of races.

its big money, and you want to ensure that those betting are betting on the riders, not the bikes. variable equipment would introduce a whole different sets of variables into the bookmaking equations.

-joel -- joel metz : magpie@blackbirdsf.org : http://www.blackbirdsf.org/ bike messengers worldwide : ifbma : http://www.messengers.org/ magpie messenger collective http://www.magpiemessenger.com/
           portland, oregon ==
             i know what innocence looks like - and it wasn't there,
                                   after she got that bicycle...