L Travers wrote:
>
> > I have to disagree with this. I scored a pair of Contis at
>> the St Louis
>> bike swap. The box was marked 27 inch, but the tag the shop
>> had on them
> > said 700x22. So thinking just what Mark wrote, bought them. I tried
> > putting them on two wheels. After much stretching and creative
> > language, I knew there was no way they would go on. I measured the
> > circumference vs the circumference of a different model Conti
> > tubular that I am able to mount. It was 3 inches less. Clearly
> > there is a difference.
Fred Rafael Rednor wrote:
> I'm sure that had to be mistake of some sort. I mean the
>guys in the shop must have both mismarked the tires and put
>them in the wrong box. The Continental catalogue (and the Web
>site) indicate that, as far as tubulars are concerned,
>27=28=700.
It's also quite possible that Continental mis-marked them. I have seen many incorrectly marked Continental tires.
However, if they are _smaller_ than regular tubulars, they might be 26 inch, a.k.a. 650C
If "27 inch" tubulars existed, they would be _larger_ than 700C, and they would be too _loose_ on the rim, not too tight!
Sheldon "No Sucha Thing" Brown
--
Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
http://harriscyclery.com
Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
http://captainbike.com
Useful articles about bicycles and cycling
http://sheldonbrown.com