[CR]Reynolds 531 vs. Columbus SL

(Example: Events:Eroica)

From: <jeff-arg@bizwi.rr.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:27:08 -0500
Subject: [CR]Reynolds 531 vs. Columbus SL

An friend of mine and I were talking about bikes last night and he asked, "wasn't the Columbus SL tubing allways lighter than Reynolds 531?" I couldn't give a definitive answer. My inclination was to agree. However, I have a digital scale that is on my bike stand and thought about some of the bare frames (sans forks) that I have weighed. The Colnagos built with SL are typically around 1900 grams but so are the Masi's built with 531. A Windsor I just bought made of SL is actually heavier than a Raysport I have made of 531.

Does anyone know of standardized tubing weight measures between 531 and SL for comparison?

Jeff Pyzyk
Milwaukee, WI