[CR] Differences in light weight tubing...can it really make much difference?

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

From: Tom Sanders <tsan7759142@sbcglobal.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:35:46 -0400
Thread-Index: AcejCt2hLVjmBJPKTpWhg2u+yQ4MNQ==
Subject: [CR] Differences in light weight tubing...can it really make much difference?

Given that nearly all the light weight tubing for making bicycles weighs relatively the same...a tiny variation doesn't seem to make much difference. The frame itself would have only a very small weight difference from one to another of these tubes, is my thought. Then realizing what a small portion of the total weight of the bike is a function of frame weight, it is hard to see how all this could translate to much difference in the real world. Perhaps different tubing requires different construction techniques? Possible, but doesn't seem to be a critical factor.7 When we discuss tire weight, the weight of pedals or rims my attention is immediately drawn. I feel these things really make a difference in the actual performance of the bike. The difference in the total weight between different sets of high quality tubes seems rather inconsequential by comparison. I wonder what the frame builders on the list have to say about this? I know some use a mix of tubing...they must have their reasons...
Tom Sanders
Lansing, Mi USA