Re: [CR]Still confused about Cinellis

(Example: Framebuilding:Technology)

Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:01:58 -0700
From: "Jim Allen" <MotorRef@peoplepc.com>
To: marcus.e.helman@gm.com
Subject: Re: [CR]Still confused about Cinellis
References: <OF71528560.F5D56765-ON852572D5.0058CB41-852572D5.00594B0E@gm.com>
In-Reply-To:
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

I'm currently refinishing two Cinellis.

Neither has drilled fork tanges, both have drilled lugs.

#5158 has fender eyelets and bosses on the brake bridge and chainstay bridge.

# 5029 has no eyelets or bosses on the bridges.

Jim Allen the CycleSmiths Ranchita, CA 760 782 0234

marcus.e.helman@gm.com wrote:
>Jeff Pyzyk wote (in part)
>
>My later bike [Cinelli SC] I have figured for a '68 or '69. It has the
>drilled lugs, but with fender mounting bosses and loops, four digit serial
>number. But here is the part that makes me think it's an early drilled
>lug frame; the fork lug tangs are not drilled. Any comments from the
>Cinelli Cognoscenti?
>
>
>My Cinelli SC, number 4874, has drilled lugs and undrilled fork tangs. It
>has no provisions for fenders. I have figured mine to be '68 or 69 too,
>based on lack of braze-ons
>
>Best regards,
>Marcus Helman
>Huntington Woods, MI