Re: [CR]Bike Weight

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli:Laser)

Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 06:19:35 -0500
From: "John Wood" <braxton72@gmail.com>
To: "Neil Foddering" <neilfoddering@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Bike Weight
In-Reply-To: <BAY141-W47714AA37F299B477A3F78BF980@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY103-W2682FE72CBFFC175569328909E0@phx.gbl>
cc: "classicrendezvous@bikelist.org" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
cc: "classicrendezvous@bikelist.org"

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Neil Foddering <neilfoddering@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think that someone may have touched on this, but a phrase that sticks i
> n my mind is "an ounce on the rim is worth a pound on the frame",

Sorry to say that this is yet another myth that has been debunked in recent years. I'm sure there are others on the list that can explain it better than I can, but weight is weight regardless of where it's located. A heavier wheel will indeed take a bit more energy to accelerate, but will keep it's momentum better. For climbing, a lighter will help, only because it reduces overall bike weight. An ounce on the rim is worth an ounce on the frame. This has been much discussed on other forums.

--
John Wood
Washington Island, Wisconsin, USA