Re[3]: [CR]A source of 15/17g (1.8/1.4mm) spokes?

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli:Laser)

Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:20:44 -0400
From: "Dmitry Yaitskov" <dima@rogers.com>
To: Jan Heine <heine94@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re[3]: [CR]A source of 15/17g (1.8/1.4mm) spokes?
In-Reply-To: <a062309b5c4f828c45d21@[192\.168\.1\.33]>
References: <727048092.20080917153811@rogers.com> <1345458222.20080917171821@rogers.com> <48D1EE36.50208@m-gineering.nl> <1889389242.20080918094442@rogers.com> <a062309b5c4f828c45d21@[192.168.1.33]>
cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

Hi,

Thursday, September 18, 2008, 11:53:57 AM, Jan Heine wrote:
> At 9:44 AM -0400 9/18/08, Dmitry Yaitskov wrote:
>>
>>IMO there is a lot of space between "original" with proper period
>>spokes, and "daily beater". I bought the Hetchins for looks, but I do
>>not want it to be a wall decoration - if keeping it original prevents
>>me from riding it (and enjoying the ride), I will sacrifice the
>>originality. At least that's what my current thinking is :) In any
>>case, coming back to spokes - I think spokes that look good and
>>"proper" from 3 meters away are good enough for me.
> If you use modern spokes, you may need washers under the spoke heads.
> Modern hub flanges often are a lot thicker than those on older hubs,
> and the spoke elbows are longer to match.
> If you use spokes with elbows that are too long, you will break
> spokes prematurely.

This particular wheel that I want to rebuild already does have washers under the spoke heads (and I think I will reuse them). Which may be another indication that the wheel is a recently attempted build (I say "attempted" because, as I explained earlier, all the spokes on it were loose when I received it, and they were laced through the wrong holes).

--
Cheers,
Dmitry Yaitskov,
Toronto, Canada.