Re: [CR]Dumb Question, BB cable guides

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Chater-Lea)

Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:20:03 -0700
From: "Kurt Sperry" <haxixe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Dumb Question, BB cable guides
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <OFA5D1AE7E.61971210-ON852574E8.000FC4B9-852574E8.00106C8A@gm.com>
References: <MONKEYFOODXf2LTrpwA00000059@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org>


I've always preferred top mounted cable runs, they stay cleaner and are easier to lube/service. Having the RD cable stop on top of the c-stay gives a neater looking run for the housing too.

Kurt Sperry Bellingham Washington USA.

2008/10/19 <marcus.e.helman@gm.com>:
> Why did framebuilders start running cables under the bottom bracket? It
> seems to offer no advantage. I have one bike with the cables run on top
> of the BB, and one with the cables running underneath. There is no
> difference in shifting that I can tell. Maybe it's just esthetics.
> Personally, I prefer the more traditional top of BB treatment.

>

>

> Wondering,

> Marcus Helman

> Detroit, MI