Re: [CR]Brooks Saddles; Durability of Ti rails????

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

In-Reply-To: <E1L2tBx-000161-2W@elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References:
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:20:53 -0800
To: Mark Stonich <mark@bikesmithdesign.com>
From: "Jan Heine" <heine94@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Brooks Saddles; Durability of Ti rails????
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

>I mentioned to a friend I was thinking about a Ti railed Brooks for
>a saddle. He said that when he worked for a wholesale outfit, Island
>Cycle back in the '80s, they got several returned Brooks' with
>broken Ti rails.

It happened to my first-generation Swift, but only after several years of riding and a number of crashes (I was racing back then.)
>Has this been a problem with current production?

I think that problem has been overcome, so I wouldn't worry about it.
>BTW while the diminished quality of anything cycle related is cause
>for sadness, I must admit that I'm glad it no longer takes a
>bazzillion miles to break in a Brooks.

My Professional Titanium took 2000 miles to break in, and was worn out after 3000 miles. It was the non-presoftened version. Get the pre-softened version, so at least it's comfortable from the start, even if it doesn't last.

Jan Heine
Editor
Bicycle Quarterly
140 Lakeside Ave #C
Seattle WA 98122
http://www.bikequarterly.com