Re: [CR]Eddy Merckx and De Rosa frame relationship?

(Example: Framebuilding)

In-Reply-To: <8CB3697676A6823-CB0-D9F@WEBMAIL-MA11.sysops.aol.com>
References: <813065.13796.qm@web31406.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
From: "Phil Brown" <philcycles@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Eddy Merckx and De Rosa frame relationship?
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:31:00 -0800
To: "Classicrendezvous@" <Bikelist.OrgRENDEZVOUSclassicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


On Dec 27, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Dale Brown wrote:
> In close scrutiny, there are differences, the most significant is that
> of the joinery at the dropouts... DeRosa almost always had the extra
> refined "points" filed in the dropouts where they meet the stays.
> Later, Eddie also embraced the Columbus pre-crimped stay ends rather
> than do any filing at all at those junctures. Those and other nuances
> make me think that, in balance, DeRosa was always slightly more
> refined...
>
> That is just one man's opinion however....? :)
>

Mine as well. It's the difference between a frame made by a rider-a tool to win races-and a master frame builder for whom the frame is an end unto itself. Phil Brown Cold today in Berkeley, Calif.