In old logo, the only 42 width that was typically offered was the 66/42. The 63 and 64 did not come in the 42 width. Now I suspect there could be exceptions, but I've never seen one.
Mike Kone in Boulder CO USA
> Still hoping one of you are willing to sell me a Cinelli 64-42 or 64-44
\r?\n> from your stash(es). Need one for the Italvega I'm putting back on the
\r?\n> road.
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Thanks!
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Jay Sexton
\r?\n> Sebastopol, CA
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Jay,
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n> A few years ago I heard that Richard Sachs had some old logo 42 cm Cinellis,
\r?\n> NOS, that he was willing to sell for either $200 or $300. This is a typical
\r?\n> price for NOS wide, old Cinellis, which should give you some idea of how scarce
\r?\n> they are. I'll add that this scarcity extends to used examples, though
\r?\n> obviously they don't command the same amounts. On the rare occasion that they
\r?\n> turn up, I see nice used examples sell on eBay around $100 - $150. That's why I
\r?\n> have zero sets when I'd like to have three. The 40 cm bars are MUCH easier to
\r?\n> get, though still not abundant. 38's are a bit more common still. My
\r?\n> impression is that 42's were unsually wide in the pre-1978 timeframe of the old
\r?\n> logo, whereas they became the standard for adult men by the 1980's. So, hoping
\r?\n> that someone might trade a set of 42s or 44s (I don't know that the Giros even
\r?\n> came that wide in
\r?\n> the old logo days) for your 40s is a bit like asking if someone would like to
\r?\n> trade their Inverted Jenny postage stamp for a normally oriented one. Okay....
\r?\n> I'm exaggerating a little, but figure that the 42s are worth a few times the
\r?\n> amount of the 40s.
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Tom Dalton
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Be a better friend, newshound, and
\r?\n> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.