Re: [CR]Re: "Arnold-like" Alloy Crankarm bolts

(Example: Racing:Beryl Burton)

Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:50:55 -0800
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: "Arnold-like" Alloy Crankarm bolts
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, Nor Meyer <norbikes@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <430e89320901070823p4843a5d4n65719931e2d561cb@mail.gmail.com>


The instructions themsleves are stupid. If you're going to have to use steel bolts every time you tighten the cranks, then the alloy bolts serve no purpose. May as well just remove the bolts altogether after you've tightened the cranks and save yet another few grams. Of course, maybe you need to carry the steel bolts with you in case you have to retighten the cranks, but then you haven't reduced the total weight of bike and rider and gear. Like I said, alloy crank bolts were a really stupid idea.

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Big Spring, Texas, USA


--- On Wed, 1/7/09, Nor Meyer wrote:


> From: Nor Meyer <norbikes@gmail.com>

\r?\n> Subject: [CR]Re: "Arnold-like" Alloy Crankarm bolts

\r?\n> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

\r?\n> Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 10:23 AM

\r?\n> A really stupid idea, IMHO. I mean one of the principal

\r?\n> functions of a

\r?\n> crank bolt is to tighten the cranks, and alloy bolts could

\r?\n> not do so without

\r?\n> a high risk of failure.

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Uh, if you'd bothered to read the instructions prior to

\r?\n> installing, you'd

\r?\n> have discovered that you first install the crank arms with

\r?\n> *steel* bolts,

\r?\n> then remove them and replace w the nifty aluminum ones...

\r?\n> It's that "bling

\r?\n> factor" ya kno, sorta like "Built for Speed"

\r?\n> decals on some bikes. Very

\r?\n> stylin'

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Nor Meyer, holed up in icey Mt. Vernon, IA