Re: [CR] colombus aelle tubing

(Example: Framebuilders:Tubing:Columbus)

In-Reply-To: <594567.80288.qm@web34208.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <594567.80288.qm@web34208.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
From: "Phil Brown" <philcycles@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:21:53 -0800
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] colombus aelle tubing


On Jan 16, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Fred Rednor wrote:
> BTW I recall once reading an interesting statement from some True
> Temper representative. (Or was it Reynolds?) Anyway he stated that,
> with ultra thin walled tubing, it was easier to maintain consistent
> wall thickness at the butts if the tubing were seamed. This is
> because the variable wall thickness of the tube is created while the
> metal is still in its pre-rolled, sheet form.

Sadly for True Temper they had quality problems in the past that did not occur with mandrel drawn tubes-inconsistent walls and straightness . They are better now but I haven't bought any for about 5 years-lots of tubes on hand and not much frame building.
Phil Brown
In Berkeley, Calif.