Re: [CR] Aelle tubing.

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

In-Reply-To: <1913710813.4155641232207253460.JavaMail.root@sz0035a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net>
References: <1913710813.4155641232207253460.JavaMail.root@sz0035a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net>
From: "Phil Brown" <philcycles@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:09:13 -0800
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] Aelle tubing.


On Jan 17, 2009, at 7:47 AM, <billydavid13@comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi all. I know nothing about metallurgy. But perhaps the cheaper
> [thicker?
> heavier?] were easier to work with, more tolerant of heat, etc., esp.
> for a less experienced brazer. I remember when Reynolds introduced 753
> and
> required builders to certify before they could use it. Aelle may have
> been
> a good way to train building staff and not so expensive if they
> botched it.
> I also tend to think that design and execution trump tubing. Billy
> Ketchum
> ; Chicago, IL; USA.
>

It's true that heavier tubing is more tolerant of heat etc. but the difference isn't that great. A normal DB tube had a wall of 0.9/0.6 and

an Aelle tube has a 1.0 wall so it's not really different. And the 753 certification deal I always thought was more a marketing deal to make 753 seem "special." It's just a heat treated 531 and if you use silver you're OK. Phil Brown Failed marketing, unlike Reynolds, in Berkeley, Calif.