Re: [CR] Cyclingnews test of Schwinn Paramount 70th Anniversary

(Example: Racing:Jean Robic)

Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:32:23 -0800
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: CLASSIC RENDEZVOUS <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, Angel Garcia <veronaman@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <70e14d4c0903040456s38fb3722j32e2eefbb10efbc0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] Cyclingnews test of Schwinn Paramount 70th Anniversary


At $7,000 for the frame and fork, we'll see if anyone in this economy still has way too much disposable cash.

I don't like the carbon fork and what at least looks like a sloping toptube ala "compact" frames. But even without those drawbacks, I can think of an almost unlimited number of true classic bikes I would rather spend $7,000 on. To be quite honest, I much prefer my 50th Anniversary Paramount, which I bought for less than $1,000 for the complete bike. I think maybe there was a 60th Anniversary, but I can't remember the details. Was that the one which was offered in steel, titanium or aluminum, with a different framebuilder producing each of the three?

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Big Spring, Texas, USA


--- On Wed, 3/4/09, Angel Garcia wrote:


> From: Angel Garcia <veronaman@gmail.com>

\r?\n> Subject: [CR] Cyclingnews test of Schwinn Paramount 70th Anniversary

\r?\n> To: "CLASSIC RENDEZVOUS" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

\r?\n> Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2009, 6:56 AM

\r?\n> http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=tech/2009/reviews/schwinn_paramount09

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Angel Garcia

\r?\n> Long Valley NJ

\r?\n>

\r?\n> --

\r?\n> You may enjoy reading my blog:

\r?\n> http://www.italiancyclingjournal.blogspot.com