Re: [CR] Mark Agree's tire inflation

(Example: Humor:John Pergolizzi)

In-Reply-To: <000d01c9e2aa$5ba18700$12e49500$@net>
References: <000d01c9e2aa$5ba18700$12e49500$@net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:47:42 -0400
From: "Ken Freeman" <kenfreeman096@gmail.com>
To: Tom Sanders <tesanders@comcast.net>
Cc: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] Mark Agree's tire inflation


Not only that, but (having just ridden with Mark) he has the ability to levitate the bike at will and engage warp drive. Perhaps the ether drag of a sew-up is less than that of a clincher ...

Seriously, at the low end of a sound pressure choice, rim protection is the issue. Road condition and quality enters into it. I tried a few weeks back to ride my bike-that-has-clinchers-but-might-not-be-on-topic with the pressure set for 15% sag per the Frank Berto chart. On smooth recent asphalt it was real good, but on one of our local reputed (no longer deserved!) "great cycling" roads, I think I got some new rear rim dithers. So general recommendations need to be considered based on local conditions and how you ride. If one is lot better than I am about watching where the heck you're going, you might get away with a softer tire.

Ken Freeman Ann Arbor, MI USA

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Tom Sanders <tesanders@comcast.net> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Bear in mind that Mark may get away with 100 PSI, but that the rascal
> doesn't have an ounce of fat on him. He is about 155# of pure muscle and
> faster than a Jack Rabbit. For us of the 200# persuasion, I think
> perhaps
> a bit more tire pressure may well be in order.

>

> Tom Sanders

>

> Lansing, MI USA