Re: [CR] Huret Jubilee Rears and Rears in General ?

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing)

Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:41:14 -0700
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, John Betmanis <johnb@oxford.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AAA5818.4090806@oxford.net>
Subject: Re: [CR] Huret Jubilee Rears and Rears in General ?


As per my previous post, my experience is that this rating is VERY conservative. I think maybe Sutherland's listed the RD ranges per the manufacturers specs, rather than having tested it themselves.

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Big Spring, Texas, USA


--- On Fri, 9/11/09, John Betmanis wrote:


> From: John Betmanis <johnb@oxford.net>

\r?\n> Subject: Re: [CR] Huret Jubilee Rears and Rears in General ?

\r?\n> To: "Classic Rendezvous" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

\r?\n> Date: Friday, September 11, 2009, 9:00 AM

\r?\n> r cielec wrote:

\r?\n>

\r?\n> > Re: Huret Jubilee rear ders., short cage version

\r?\n> > I am of the understanding that the max. rear sprocket

\r?\n> is 26t-28t, depending on one's specific set-up (that is: at

\r?\n> these limits, it's a trial and error as to whether a 26t or

\r?\n> a 28t can be handled).

\r?\n> > Can anyone confirm this, please?

\r?\n>

\r?\n> My Sutherland's 3rd Edition says:

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Huret Jubilee 2000 (short cage) -

\r?\n> Max. freewheel 24T, Max. total capacity 30T.

\r?\n>

\r?\n> (Total capacity is the difference between the smallest and

\r?\n> largest FW plus the difference between the smallest and

\r?\n> largest CW.)

\r?\n>

\r?\n> -- John Betmanis -

\r?\n> Woodstock, Ontario,

\r?\n> Canada