As per my previous post, my experience is that this rating is VERY conservative. I think maybe Sutherland's listed the RD ranges per the manufacturers specs, rather than having tested it themselves.
Regards,
Jerry Moos
Big Spring, Texas, USA
> From: John Betmanis <johnb@oxford.net>
\r?\n> Subject: Re: [CR] Huret Jubilee Rears and Rears in General ?
\r?\n> To: "Classic Rendezvous" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
\r?\n> Date: Friday, September 11, 2009, 9:00 AM
\r?\n> r cielec wrote:
\r?\n>
\r?\n> > Re: Huret Jubilee rear ders., short cage version
\r?\n> > I am of the understanding that the max. rear sprocket
\r?\n> is 26t-28t, depending on one's specific set-up (that is: at
\r?\n> these limits, it's a trial and error as to whether a 26t or
\r?\n> a 28t can be handled).
\r?\n> > Can anyone confirm this, please?
\r?\n>
\r?\n> My Sutherland's 3rd Edition says:
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Huret Jubilee 2000 (short cage) -
\r?\n> Max. freewheel 24T, Max. total capacity 30T.
\r?\n>
\r?\n> (Total capacity is the difference between the smallest and
\r?\n> largest FW plus the difference between the smallest and
\r?\n> largest CW.)
\r?\n>
\r?\n> -- John Betmanis -
\r?\n> Woodstock, Ontario,
\r?\n> Canada