Re: [CR] honesty in advertising Ebay style

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

From: "Jon M. Crate" <Jon@FAI.US>
To: 'Steve Maas' <bikestuff@nonlintec.com>, 'CR' <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <B8A16D9807634A7D9A62C8A66E721886@ToshibaLaptop> <4AB77C01.5020407@nonlintec.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:39:52 -0400
Organization: FAI Materials Testing Laboratory
Thread-Index: Aco6vWbuNPgYCbu7QkimFIOORDFnvwACIKwg
In-Reply-To: <4AB77C01.5020407@nonlintec.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] honesty in advertising Ebay style


Steve, My sentiments exactly! If the photos were poor, it would have been a totally different issue. The presence of many excellent photos outweighs the verbiage 1000:1

If they are not willing to provide good photos you must assume there are flaws to hide.

Jon M. Crate Marietta, Georgia 30066

Subject: Re: [CR] honesty in advertising Ebay style

Well, I wouldn't want to use it, but I know people who would, and as long as the condition is clear from the photos, I think the posting makes it over the bar. The buyer certainly knows what he's getting.

I once bought a chainring that was advertised as "almost new, only a couple hundred miles of use." Photos were not terribly revealing. When I received it, I just tossed it into the recycling bin--probably the most worn out bicycle component I've ever seen. That kind of situation is fundamentally different, and I think it's worthwhile not to confuse the two.

Steve Maas Göteborg, Sweden

Steven Maasland wrote:
> Check out this ebay auction for what should normally be a very collectible item: a first generation Campagnolo cotterless BB, from the late 50's
> http://ebay.com/<blah> Z360191165092