Re: [CR] colombus aelle tubing

(Example: Humor:John Pergolizzi)

Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:56:35 -0500
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
From: "John Betmanis" <johnb@oxford.net>
In-Reply-To: <594567.80288.qm@web34208.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20090117020207.D8B1B19D8D@ug6.ece.ubc.ca>
Subject: Re: [CR] colombus aelle tubing


At 06:37 PM 16/01/2009 -0800, Fred Rednor wrote:
>BTW I recall once reading an interesting statement from some True Temper representative. (Or was it Reynolds?) Anyway he stated that, with ultra thin walled tubing, it was easier to maintain consistent wall thickness at the butts if the tubing were seamed. This is because the variable wall thickness of the tube is created while the metal is still in its pre-rolled, sheet form.
>

That makes perfect sense. Since seamed tubing is made from flat stock, its wall thickness is very consistent all the way around. Mandrel drawn tubing is much more likely to have the I.D. eccentric with the O.D, especially as the wall gets thinner.

John Betmanis
Woodstock, Ontario
Canada