Re: [CR] Facing and reaming

(Example: Racing)

Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:41:01 -0800
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: verktyg <verktyg@aol.com>, <mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net>
In-Reply-To: <1257278618.4af08c9a95f96@www.mrrabbit.net>
Cc: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] Facing and reaming


Well, if you are asking for opinions, my opinion is that this thread is MOST DEFINITELY ON TOPIC. In my view anything that pertains to collecting, restoring, maintaining and riding classic bicycles is on topic here. The mere fact that the same techniques might also be applied to off topic bikes is completely irrevelant. Classic bikes In The Day required the prep discussed, and one still finds clssic bikes today that were never properly prepped, and so need the measures discussed in this thread. If we are going to ban any discussion that might possibly be relevant to newer bikes as well as classic ones, we aren't going to have much to discuss.

But of course my opinion isn't of much value, and neither is yours. Dale's is the only opinion that really matters.

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Big Spring, Texas, USA


--- On Tue, 11/3/09, mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net wrote:


> From: mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net <mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net>
> Subject: Re: [CR] Facing and reaming
> To: "verktyg" <verktyg@aol.com>
> Cc: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2009, 2:03 PM
> Was this ever even ON-TOPIC?
>
> It appears from the beginning to be basically a general
> bicycle mechanics
> thread which is covered quite well by at least two other
> websites that have
> forums for bicycle mechanics for bike vintage and new
> bikes.  Took a slight
> turn to ON-TOPIC for a post or two and then went OFF-TOPIC
> again.
>
> =8-)
>
> If this had been a topic from the beginning about taking a
> vintage frame and
> reaming it up to todays common diameters, etc. in order to
> fit newer headsets -
>
> then you wouldn't have heard from me...
>
> =8-)
>
>
> Robert Shackelford
> San Jose, CA USA
>
>
> Quoting verktyg <verktyg@aol.com>:
>
> > Andrew,
> >
> > Good point, hand facing tools are not that accurate
> and it's easy torque
> > the cutters to one side or the other leaving an uneven
> surface.
> >
> > The head tube and fork crown faces affect headset
> alignment and are more
> > critical than the BB faces.
> >
> > I've had to reface these surfaces a 2nd time because a
> headset wasn't
> > properly aligning.
> >
> > If the bores on the head tube are already to the
> correct size, it's easy
> > to cut them oversize with the head tube facing tool.
> >
> > I had someone make me a brass bushing to use in place
> of the head tube
> > ID reamer on my VAR #32 facing tool to prevent this.
> >
> > http://www.sheldonbrown.com/var/pages/var0021.html
> >
> > Chas. Colerich
> > Oakland, CA USA
> >
> >
> > Andrew R Stewart wrote:
> > >
> > > I have chased and faced the same frames two or
> three times over the
> > > years and each time the facing showed slight
> unevenness had existed
> > > before. Yet the same tools and techniques were
> used (I've owned my own
> > > Campy tool kit since 1980). I think I could
> repeat any number of times
> > > and still see a very slight change each time.
> > >
> > > Andrew R Stewart
> > > Rochester, NY
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> > --
> >  PRIVACY WARNING: For auditing purposes, a copy
> of this message has been
> >  saved in a permanent database.
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> PRIVACY WARNING: For auditing purposes, a copy of this
> message has been
> saved in a permanent database.