I briefly owned a '75 Pro that I too found to be a bit odd. Much too large for me (I bought it for the NR gruppo), the bike had something like a 62 cm seat tube...But the top tube was just fine for me. In the 56 or 57cm ra nge! Matthew BowneBrooklyn, New York
----------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:08:21 -0800
> From: eric.m@rocketmail.com
> To: freitas1@pacbell.net; classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Subject: Re: [CR] Raleigh Professional
>
> Didn't the Raleigh Pro come before the Team bike? I thought the Pros (esp
ecially the ones with the Brampton "fast back" seat cluster) were an inheri
ted design from Carlton. Then when Raleigh killed off Carlton the Team bike
s showed up. I've probably got it all wrong but am sure you can help me wit
h the dates...
>
> Eric Meddaugh
> San Carlos, CA usa
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bob Freitas
> To: CLASSIC RENDEZVOUS
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 6:25:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [CR] Raleigh Professional
>
>
> I am sure this has been hashed over before but my experience is that the
smaller frame sizes had longer top tubes so the 2 I had were something like
21''seat tube and 22 or even 22 1/2 TT
> also the head angles were slack so the had lots of wheel flop. The TEAM b
ikes were the real racers and the Pro s were more Poser bikes (not to offen
d anyone)
>
> BOB FREITAS
> who owns a TEAM and a TWENTY but thats all in MILL VALLEY, CA USA
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Access your email online and on the go with Windows Live Hotmail.
http://windowslive.com/