I believe that INTER. is earlier than INT., which is subsequently earlier
than INT (with no period). Both short and long reach versions can be found
with either of the markings you mentioned, as discussed in a thread earlier this
year, with photos showing long and short reach for each marking type, posted
here:
http://www.wooljersey.com/
This leads to the belief that the marking change is an example of chronological difference, as opposed to the mis-belief that the marking was shortened for short reach calipers. If the later were true, then there would be no long reach INT. calipers. All examples in my pics have cupped quick release levers, thus they are from about 1977, or later.
The question is then: When exactly did the latter, more brief INT. form appear?
Ciao, Mark Agree ...who finally got out today for 25 miles on the Italvega fixed gear, with guys on a Doniselli fixed gear and a Trek early 80s road bike there for the ride, starting and ending in the bumpy road City of... Southfield MI USA ~ ~ ~
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:30:40 +0100 From: j.kleijn <jeroen.kleijn@ziggo.nl> Subject: [CR] Int vs Inter To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Hi,
I recently got a set of Campagnolo Record brakes. After cleaning them, I noticed on the front brake Brev. Int. and on the rear brake Brev. Inter. On the back of the front brake also a smal "C" was engraved. The imprint on the rear brake look a little more sophisticated (finer)
Can someone tell me something about these brakes?
regards Jeroen Kleijn The Netherlands
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220085203x1201389322/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID %3D62%26bcd%3DMarchfooterNO62)