The lugs are gold anodized. The tubes are unanodized aluminum.
Regards,
Jerry Moos
Big Spring, Texas, USA
> From: Kurt Sperry <haxixe@gmail.com>
\r?\n> Subject: Re: [CR] Pics of Duravia
\r?\n> To: jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net
\r?\n> Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
\r?\n> Date: Sunday, May 24, 2009, 7:54 PM
\r?\n> Any idea why the lugs look so much
\r?\n> yellower than the tubes in the photos?
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Kurt Sperry
\r?\n> Bellingham, Washington
\r?\n> USA
\r?\n>
\r?\n> 2009/5/24 <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>:
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > Here is the Duravia (Mecadural) frame:
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > http://www.flickr.com/
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > Cleaned up quite nicely as is usually the case with
\r?\n> non-anodized aluminum with AL polish and Simichrome. Not a
\r?\n> $7,000 Caminargent to be sure, but still a quality frame
\r?\n> worth building up.
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > Didn't get any responses yet to my previous post
\r?\n> asking if Mafac Dural Forge brakes are too new for what
\r?\n> seems a 1954 frame, or what RD's would fit this rear DO.
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > Regards,
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > Jerry Moos
\r?\n> > Big Spring, Texas, USA