Re: [CR] Why do older frames have only one set of bottle bosses?

(Example: Racing:Wayne Stetina)

In-Reply-To: <BLU131-W25BD4CC5A5A9649761CBD0E6020@phx.gbl>
References:
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:05:55 -0400
From: "Eric Keller" <keller.ee@gmail.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] Why do older frames have only one set of bottle bosses?


When I first started building frames in the mid '70s, water bottle braze ons were not very common. Then later in the '70s it became more common to have one water bottle cage on the down tube. I usually had a second water bottle cage, either on the handlebars or clamped to the seat post, sometimes both. The thing I don't remember is why the frames I built in the early 80s only have one set of water bottle cage braze ons. The only thing I can say is for most of the races I rode in back then, one water bottle was more than enough and I was still a weight weenie. Water bottle cages always came with clamps.

I always had my pump under my top tube anyway, even without a peg a silca of the correct size will stay there. Eric Keller Boalsburg, PA

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:14 PM, michael haddad <haddawad399@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I find that on-topic frames (like my 1984 Cinelli, 1983 Pinarello & 1978 Masi) tend to have bottle cage bosses only on the down tube. I know that 2 bottles were needed for most road races (even in the 80's), so why only one set?
>
> The only thing I can think of is that the braze-ons might weaken the seat tube, but then why have them on the down tube?
>
> I have been curious about this and would be interested in hearing a definitive answer or some good theories.
>
> Regards to all,
>
> Michael Haddad
>
> Brooklyn, NY, USA