Re: [CR] Campy line up through the years

(Example: Framebuilding:Paint)

Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 12:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Steve Whitting" <ciocc_cat@yahoo.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org, "P.C. Kohler" <kohl57@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <889579.8053.qm@web54409.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] Campy line up through the years


In my experience working as a bicycle mechanic in the mid-to-late 70s, the Japanese stuff (i.e., Suntour/Shimano) was generally lacking in durability.  They shifted well enough when new and went downhill from there.  Campy always seemed to shift better once broken.  I'm still using 25 year-old Campy Super Record derailleurs on my Ciocc!

Steve Whitting

Prairieville, Louisiana USA

Website at http://ciocc-cat.angelfire.com/


--- On Sun, 5/2/10, P.C. Kohler wrote:


From: P.C. Kohler <kohl57@yahoo.com> Subject: [CR] Campy line up through the years To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Date: Sunday, May 2, 2010, 8:58 AM

"Super Record -  Misguided effort at being more starkly modern than NR but with the smallest measure of added functionality."

Huh? I thought it was an effort (and successful) to materially lower the weight of Campagnolo NR so that your basic racing bicycle fitted with Campag SRwent from around 22.5-23 lbs to 21.5 lbs. If lighter is "starkly modern" I guess that's one way of looking at it. To me it just makes for a lighter machine. Still shifts like crap but no one will ever make a Campag enthusiast out of me!

Peter Kohler
Washington DC USA