Re: [CR] Low flange hugs: High flange hubs

(Example: Events:Cirque du Cyclisme:2004)

In-Reply-To: <000701ca917a$2f834490$8e89cdb0$@com>
References: <000701ca917a$2f834490$8e89cdb0$@com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 16:25:48 -0600
From: "David Manderscheid" <dmanderscheid@gmail.com>
To: <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] Low flange hugs: High flange hubs


Look better? To each their own. I prefer low flange myself.

David Manderscheid Lincoln, NE

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Tom Sanders <tom@orderandchaos.com> wrote:
> I have used mostly high flange hubs for years, but have had my share of low
> flange ones too. The high flange variety have only advantage I have ever
> been aware of: They look better. The possible disadvantage they have is
> pretty limited to one thing, too, far as I have seen: They cost more. As
> far as what you call them, it is a tempest in a tea pot. The only thing is
> that in abbreviating large flange to LF one can cause confusion. Does one
> really need to abbreviate?
>
> Seeking the simple life,

>

> Tom Sanders

>

> Lansing, MI USA