Re: [CR] another Osgear/Super Champion question

(Example: Humor)

Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:16:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: <joeb-z@comcast.net>
To: Peter Brueggeman <4peebee@peterbrueggeman.com>
In-Reply-To: <8B0E8B73EBD542C7B427B34BA97B797A@PC11364>
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] another Osgear/Super Champion question


Well, Simplex had the 543 to address this. That's 5 or 4 or 3 cogs. They cost a lot then I suppose and they really cost a whole lot now. Setting Simplex derailleurs of this era set up was an art form. It took me an hour to get a TDF right with all the possible iterations. Once you do that it is quite good. I have never set up a 543 so I wonder what that is like?

Joe Bender-Zanoni
Whitneyville. CT


----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Brueggeman <4peebee@peterbrueggeman.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:26:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [CR] another Osgear/Super Champion question


Kurt Sperry said "...why in the '50s did major derailleur producers such as Simplex, Huret and Cyclo produce distinct derailleur models for 3, 4 and 5 cog freewheels? ..."

In addition to the range of travel design mentioned by Neil Foddering, some manufacturers had rear derailleurs specific to 1/8" inch chain or 3/32" chain. Among the several Simplex 303T rear derailleurs I have, those marked for 3/32" chain won't run a 1/8" chain because the pulley cage is too narrow. The derailleur's chain capacity is marked on the derailleur, so it's no surprise. Some manufacturers like Cyclo Benelux had a pulley cage wide enough to accept either chain width.

Peter

Peter Brueggeman
La Jolla California USA
4peebee(at)peterbrueggeman.com