[CR] Fwd: Spoke questions

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing:Falck)

Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:40:46 +0000 (UTC)
From: <billydavid13@comcast.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <811503908.167639.1277141718297.JavaMail.root@sz0035a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net>
Subject: [CR] Fwd: Spoke questions


----- Forwarded Message ----- From: billydavid13@comcast.net To: "marcus e helman" <marcus.e.helman@saab.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 12:35:18 PM Subject: Re: [CR] Spoke questions

Hi Marcus. The Robergel 3 star spokes were reputed to be stretchy, justly so in my opinion. Union were better but i believe that was a plated spoke. The modern stainless spokes mentioned by listers are superior. I'm not sure there's any good reason for not building a wheel 3X which would allow shorter spokes. If you're determined to be period correct, i'd go w/ the Unions. And even though a lot of classic wheels were built 4x, 3x was also common. Personally i build my rears 3x, 14/15 [e.g. DT Competition] and my fronts 2x 14/17 w/ alloy nipples [e.g. DT Revolution.] Butted spokes are arguably better, easier to build, [less windup] and more resilient as well as lighter. Good luck. Billy [who generally enjoys rehashing old themes and often finds Google searches impersonal and less than helpful] Ketchum; Chicago, IL; USA.


----- Original Message -----
From: marcus e helman
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 9:38:26 AM
Subject: [CR] Spoke questions


I am getting ready to build a set of wheels, but locating spokes has turned out to be a bit of a challenge.  I am building 4 cross on Campagnolo Nuovo Record low flange, which means I need 305 or 306mm.  So, a couple of questions:

Can I reuse the old spokes?  I once built wheels on used rims, and I have regretted it. When I was a kid Robergel Trois Etoiles were considered the best, but recently I have heard them disparaged.  Are they any good? What about Berg-Union? Does anyone have a source for DT, or Wheelsmith double-butted spokes in my size?

Best regards, Marcus Helman Royal Oak, MI

Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.

Confidentiality Note: This message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use, or taking of any action in reliance upon this message by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete it from your computer.