Re: [CR] Columbus SL "Competition" Tubing

(Example: History:Norris Lockley)

Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 05:56:08 -0500
From: "John Thompson" <johndthompson@gmail.com>
Organization: The Crimson Permanent Assurance
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
References: <20100714.191619.9965.1@webmail08.vgs.untd.com> <69F30360FBE440AE8BA58C08B4C51230@QWERTY28>
In-Reply-To: <69F30360FBE440AE8BA58C08B4C51230@QWERTY28>
Subject: Re: [CR] Columbus SL "Competition" Tubing


On 07/15/2010 09:16 AM, Jon M. Crate wrote:
> I would like to know the difference in weight between the
> 0.7/0.5/0.7 "Lightweight" Columbus SL" and the "Standard"
> 0.9/0.6/0.9 for the entire tubeset. Obviously there are other
> variables even for the same size frames like the type of lugs,
> amount of braising, amount of paint or internal coatings. I don't
> know if these variables are large enough to overcome the tube set
> differences, or not.

The published weights are listed in my Columbus catalog:

SL (09./0.6/0.9): 1925gm KL (0.7/0.5/0/7): 1670gm

http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/catalogs/Columbus-tubes.pdf

--

-John Thompson (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA