http://www.bikeradar.com/
Cervelo testing, narrow pave tire. Seems the folks at Vittoria have some other/new ideas? DaveP
frogeye@porterscustom.com
Porter Customs 2909 Arno NE Albuquerque, NM USA 87107 505-352-1378 1954 BN2 1959 AN5 Porter Custom Bicycles
cars:
http://www.britishcarforum.com/
blog: http://porterbikes.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Heine [mailto:heine94@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:05 AM
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] Wider = faster
>I think all the studies have shown that the aerodynamic resistance
>increases somewhere around 20 MPH so that the wider tire loses that
>roll fast advantage.
We tested different tire width in the wind tunnel, and found that the differences in wind resistance between a 25 and a 32 mm tire were lost in the noise.
The rolling resistance differences between different-width tires are significant, but they depend very much on the road surface. The rougher the road, the wider a tire is ideal. So any generalized statements on which tire is fastest is misleading. There appears to be little doubt that all things considered, a 25 mm tire is faster than a 23 mm tire on average roads, even at racing speeds. When you draft in a peloton, the aerodynamic issues are greatly reduced, anyhow, so you can ride an even wider tire. (If you are a break-away specialist, you are more concerned about aerodynamics...)
On cobblestones, a 38 mm tire will be much faster than a 25 mm tire - we tested this, too, when we measured suspension losses.
A couple of years back, Chuck Schmidt posted a report to the iBob list indicating many track riders now use 23-24 mmm tires... see
http://search.bikelist.org/
For a track bike, 24 mm probably does qualify at "fat."
Jan Heine Editor Bicycle Quarterly 2116 Western Ave. Seattle WA 98121 http://www.bikequarterly.com
Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/