[CR]One ego or a topic nearly guaranteed to explode

(Example: Racing:Roger de Vlaeminck)

Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 14:38:18 -0500
From: "Christopher Oliver" <cao-clasrend@fritz.traverse.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
References: <F103dNTXEnSxHnYHraK0000be44@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: ; from hetchinspete@hotmail.com on Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 06:58:27PM +0000
Subject: [CR]One ego or a topic nearly guaranteed to explode

After reading much of the exchange between Fred and the list, I am left with a certain ambivalence. First, let me say that I am sure based on the list and personal exchange that Dale's reasons for the CR list and site are benign. Let me also say that I consider David Blight's response well thought out and very polite. I can't say that of all elements of this exchange.

I think that regarding the market and ethics, there are very strong and varied opinions here with ideological underpinnings. I think that certain appeals to these views do more to fan the flames than extinguish them. I think Fred's decision to attack Dale was com- pletely wrongheaded regardless of his underlying views, but I also think that Dale's appeal to market ideology as a defense for what Fred saw as scalping, whether right or wrong, did little to restore peace to the list.

To summarize, I don't think anyone benefits much by turning CR into a celebrity death match between E.F.Schumacher and Ayn Rand. That sort of exchange brings much heat but no light whatsoever.

How about this as a rule for the list? "Discussion of the market and its actors from an ethics perspective save for particular cases of fraud is forbidden."

Peace, dude?

--
Christopher Oliver, oliver@traverse.net
Got vole?