Re: Some clarification of terms (Re: [CR]Yet another viewpoint)

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

In-Reply-To: <20020824.151758.-100030007.61.richardsachs@juno.com>
References: <20020824.151758.-100030007.61.richardsachs@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 13:23:25 -0700
To: Richard M Sachs <richardsachs@juno.com>
From: "Brandon Ives" <monkeylad@mac.com>
Subject: Re: Some clarification of terms (Re: [CR]Yet another viewpoint)
Cc: BobHoveyGa@aol.com, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


At 3:17 PM -0400 8/24/02, Richard M Sachs wrote:
>Brandon Ives <monkeylad@mac.com> writes:
><... The same goes for other folks like Sachs and Lyon
>who have been building very similar frames
>for the past 30 years...>
>
>mine are not similar, it's just that i still join tubes with lugs.

I was wondering if someone would say something about definition of "similar." By similar I mean that you are still building pinned lugged steel frames like you have in the past. You like many modern builders that have been building for 20+ years have added more modern touches but only ones that you belive actually improve the end result. I think you say it best on your website, "I don't choose the latest angles for this season's riding position. And I don't change my material choice, tube shape, or joining process with each new model year. .(SNIP) . . I do things the "old" way." enjoy, Brandon"monkeyman"Ives Off to work on the neighbor's bike for beer in Santa Barbara, Calif. --
   ++++++++++++++ "Nobody can do everything, but if everybody did something everything would get done." --Gil Scott-Heron--
   ++++++++++++++ Elfie and Monkeyboy's Wurld uv Wunder http://www.uweb.ucsb.edu/~mkirklan/
   ++++++++++++++