[CR]NOW:This horse is dead WAS:Omega/Gillott, what if

(Example: Framebuilding:Restoration)

From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
References: <20021129.121411.-3973241.0.richardsachs@juno.com> <3DE79550.A0B16D7C@earthlink.net> <00b401c297ed$2283c6e0$240885cd@hppav>
Subject: [CR]NOW:This horse is dead WAS:Omega/Gillott, what if
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:21:31 -0700

Richard Rose wrote:
>
> Pardon me for butting in here but I think what e-richie meant was that there
> was still room in the pro peleton for a lugged steel bike but that the
> marketplace prevents such a thing from happening. Correct me if I am wrong
> richie.
> After all, what would happen in the (bicycle) marketplace if Lance won his
> 5'th consecutive tour next year on a beautiful lugged steel creation, albeit
> with a set of Hyperon's, a threadless stem & STI shifters? Chaos I tell you,
> Chaos!

Richard, we pretty much beat this same horse to death a month or two ago.

No there is not still room in the pro peleton for lugged steel bikes. Nothing in the marketplace prevents such a thing (remember Litespeeds painted as Treks?), it's that the pros don't want to ride them in the peleton. This has nothing to do what I want to ride, only the facts about what the current situation is in professional road racing.

Lance Armstrong cares about grams!

Chuck Schmidt SoPas, SoCal

.