How are the dates being established for the front derailleurs???
Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena (no connection with Pasadena actually), Southern California
nick zatezalo wrote:
>
> OK Here is what I have in front of me.
> 71 no circlip/no bulge
> 72 no circlip w/bulge
> 72 no circlip/no bulge
> 73 circlip w/bulge [Just bought this from e-RICHIE]
> 76 circlip w/bulge
> ? circlip w/bulge
> Don't know what all this means,but thems the facts man.
> Nick Zatezalo
> Atlanta,GA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org
> [mailto:classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org]On Behalf Of Richard M
> Sachs
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:53 PM
> To: sachs@erols.com
> Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org; GPVB1@cs.com
> Subject: Re: [CR]re: Early Campy Record front der. with cable stop -
> question
>
> <<<on eBay right now (item # 1075928136)>>>
>
> I have never seen such a brute. To me, the interesting observation is
> not
> just the circlip, but the swelling at the other end of that shaft. In my
> memory, that was not done until well after the circlip -- in fact, I
> haven't seen many of these bulges on pre-CPSC (lipped) units. But,
> I could be getting senile.
> harvey sachs
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
> cuz.
> this looks concocted, as in, the swelling we remember on the post cpsc
> changers is integral to the casting. this one <appears> to be a shaft
> ''inserted'' through the body to act as a surrogate** circlip holder.
> none of my early OR post cpsc changers look like this one.
> e-RICHIE
>
> **a town near harrogate