Re: [CR]frame material

(Example: Framebuilders:Tony Beek)

From: Jerry & Liz Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: <OROBOYZ@aol.com>, <flasher1@optonline.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <126.14ccb9ca.2a81f674@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]frame material
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:14:17 -0500


Assuming Jay was speaking of Teledyne or Speedwell, I'll say that the Teledyne, with tubing OD and wall thickness only slightly greater than the steel frames of the time, was noticeably flexier, as were the aluminumVitus frames of the era with tube OD similar to steel. Alan was a little closer to steel, I presume because they used thicker tube walls (witness the 25.0 seatpost). These bikes I know from having personally owned them, can't really comment on Speedwell. These frames were all lighter than the conventional 531 frames of the time, but I wouldn't call them "faster". As others have commented, you can make a frame of desired quality out of any of the common materials - Gary Klein demonstrated how to make a stiff aluminum frame (I think this was still in the "classic" era and therefore on topic) and thin walled steel frames can be made pretty flexy if you try. Never noticed the flexy Vitus 979 slowing Sean Kelly down much though.

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Houston, TX


----- Original Message -----
From: OROBOYZ@aol.com
To: flasher1@optonline.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CR]frame material



> In a message dated 8/6/2002 10:39:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> flasher1@optonline.net writes:
>
> << jay. >>
>
> Jay:
> CR rules require your complete name (first and last) and hometown as part of
> the signature in every message to the list. In addition, discussion of Ti
> bikes except maybe Teledyne & Speedwell are off topic. ...
> Thanks
> Dale
>
> Dale Brown
> List manager
> Greensboro, North Carolina
> <A HREF="http://www.classicrendezvous.com/main.htm">Classic Rendezvous</A>