In a message dated 11/11/2003 12:58:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, BobHoveyGa@aol.com writes:
<< It has always been my understanding that the terms "vintage" and "Classic" had totally different meanings, (the former temporal and the latter qualitative). That is, any item good or bad could one day become "vintage" by just reaching a certain age. "Classic" on the other hand, implies a degree of quality that sets it apart from its contemporaries (as is borne out by two of its four dictionary definitions, "model of excellence, outstanding" and "of lasting significance or worth"). Thus the term need not be age-related, and the (oft-abused) term "a modern classic" is not an oxymoron as some people think. >>
This is the most cogent and logical approach I have ever heard! Hooray Bob! I will embrace this explanation for the differences between Vintage & Classic from this point on! Bravo!
Dale Brown
Greensboro, North Carolina