my way of measuring (measuring along the centerline of the frame's central plane) yields the half cm diff that you note, not the 1 ephgrave mm that you not after the fact. e-RICHIE chester, ct
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Joe Starck
<josephbstarck@yahoo.com> writes:
> Richard,
> 'tis true I cursed, but pray tell how I contradicted
> myself?
> Starck,
> Joe
>
> --- Richard M Sachs <richardsachs@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > if my stated jigged dimension is along the
> > virtual centerline, then you not only contra-
> > dicted youself, you also cursed.
> > e-RICHIE
> > chester, ct
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > snipped:
> > Joe Starck <josephbstarck@yahoo.com> writes:
> > Now then, it is tue that there is a substantial
> > difference (close to a half centimeter is what I
> > recall) between measuring along the centerline of
> > the
> > frame's central plane (i.e., in line with the main
> > triangle, not the stays) and measuring along the
> > stay
> > -- on a naked frame -- BUT, when you measure with
> > the
> > parts ON, from the center of the crank bolt to the
> > center of the skewer, the difference between this
> > measured dimension via your tape and Richard S's
> > stated dimension as he jigs along the central plane,
> > is about one fucking millimeter.
> > Starck,
> > Joe
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/