Yep,
Looks like he has got it right this time. Appears to be a 1950 frame which makes really interesting. Shame about the damage on the top tube.
Mike Short, Austin TX
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 06:23:04 -0700 "stevens" <stevens@veloworks.com>
writes:
>
>
>
> Judging by the various "how to identify" items here:
>
> http://www.flying-scot.co.uk/
> http://www.flying-scot.co.uk/
> http://www.flying-scot.co.uk/
>
> I think he might be right.
>
> I'd like to see more detailed shots, though, especially of the
> seatstay
> attachments, the bottom bracket shell, etc.
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:30:13 -0400, Paul & Maureen Williams wrote
> > Folks,
> >
> > This chap's listings get even more bizarre:
> >
> >
>
http://ebay.com/
> >
> > The Pog(?) is now a c.1950 Flying Scot. Any of the FS officianados
>
> > care to comment? Is this a case of a little knowledge is a
> dangerous
> > thing or the danger of misuse of the internet?
> >
> > And "foot basket" surely that is a give-away about his knowledge?
> >
> > Paul Williams,
> > Ottawa
> >
> > _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> --
> Steven L. Sheffield
> stevens at veloworks dot com
> veloworks at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net
> bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
> ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea aye tee why you ti ay aitch
> aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash
> double-you
> double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash
> _______________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________
Get your name as your email address.
Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/