Re: [CR]Huret Jubilee Questions

(Example: Framebuilding:Brazing Technique)

Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:21:06 -0600
From: "John Thompson" <JohnThompson@new.rr.com>
Organization: The Crimson Permanent Assurance
To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Huret Jubilee Questions
References: <6.1.2.0.0.20050322095837.01b9fd48@mail1.lexairinc.com> <42403E5D.2030202@new.rr.com> <6.1.2.0.0.20050322111738.01c89f60@mail1.lexairinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20050322111738.01c89f60@mail1.lexairinc.com>


George Allen wrote:
> Thanks for the information. The pulleys are the ball-bearing type. I was
> hoping they were used on Huret cheapest models.

I've seen the ball bearing pulleys on some old (60s-70s) Allvit and Svelto derailleurs, so if you spot a junker with these you may get lucky.
> Oh well. I'm familiar
> with the Duopar. Is the Success a Sachs incarnation?

The Success is essentially a Duopar body with a short, non-articulated pulley cage. It actually pre-dates the Sachs era, but was continued under the Huret-Sachs label for at least a couple years. Here's a picture of my pre-Sachs Success Ti:

http://www.os2.dhs.org/pictures/gallery/bikes/dsc02704?full=1
> Also, the
> derailleur on e-bay to which you refer is for French tubing. I assume
> this will not mount to a Raleigh. The derailleur I took off the bike was
> marked 28.6 which is nominally 1-1/8".

Bummer. I didn't notice that detail. It is possible you could ream it a little to accommodate the larger tubing, but it would be fairly tricky due to the delicacy of the parts.
> One more thing, what is the
> difference between 1st and 2nd generations of these derailleurs and does
> anyone know their date of manufacture? Thanks again.

That I'm not sure. Perhaps someone here knows of a Huret timeline?

--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA