Re: [CR]Recommendations on digital cameras?

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:44:53 -0500
From: "sasha eysymontt" <sashae@gmail.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Recommendations on digital cameras?
In-Reply-To: <8C81D918D556DFB-1ECC-6BF3@MBLK-M24.sysops.aol.com>
References: <6.1.2.0.0.20060324103340.03809c98@gwpop.wvu.edu> <20060324161619.48320.qmail@web82207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <f6a5a5da0603240946m12b4a23dq283e9faeb1b44d5e@mail.gmail.com> <4cf40a5c9a4079f1afb7aed2457c5db5@SpiritOne.com>


On 3/24/06, oroboyz@aol.com <oroboyz@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Well, this ought to be off topic BUT because taking photos of all our
> bikes & parts is so intrinsically important to our hobby/craft/passion,
> I will jump in!
>
> First, try to avoid using a flash. It never will look good! Try to take
> pics outside on overcast days or inside with a lot of ambient or
> exterior light. Use a tripod, mini or whatever, for indoor available
> light shots (& no flash) If you have to use a flash, just realize that
> you will likely get a washed out or underexposed amateurish result.....

Tripod + lighting really does make the most signifcant difference. I'm using a Sony DSC-V3 [1] to take pictures of the various and sundry bicycles that pass through my life, and have had very good success[2] with focusing a bunch of small pin-spot halogens on the bikes (some shadows, but getting better) and using a tripod. I've been very satisfied with the Sony's focus and manual controls, and the results (I think) speak for themselves.

Of course, I'm still waiting for the day that we have a 120-film sized sensor camera available, but until then I'll make do ;)

[1] http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydscv3/
[2] http://boxwood.subtle.org/se/gallery/soldframes
---
,+'^'+ sasha eysymontt
sashae at gmail dot com - http://subtle.org/se
`+,.,+` new york city.