Re: [CR]Yet morw on HURET drop out adjustors

(Example: Framebuilding:Technology)

In-Reply-To: <20060529181459.73865.qmail@web82208.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20060529181459.73865.qmail@web82208.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Yet morw on HURET drop out adjustors
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:56:55 -0700
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


Jerome & Elizabeth Moos wrote:
> Well, I turned the adjustors around, as advised by the list. This
> frankly makes more sense than the Campy design in terms of ease of
> adjustment, although the Campys are less likely to vibrate loose.
> (snip)

and
> OK, then I need to turn them around. Actually, that makes more
> sense than the Campy design, in that it's much easier to adjust
> them when the screw heads are to the rear. (snip)

Jerry, please explain your belief that it is easier to use a screwdriver to turn a Huret adjustor than it is to use your fingers to turn a Campagnolo adjustor?

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, Southern California

.