I guess I am the guy who out sniped George Allen. Sorry, George. I feel like I have won the lotto. The cranks and rear DR on this carry 1974 dates I hear; I am hoping that means it is a Weigle. If anyone can confirm who was at the helm at Witcomb USA in 1974 I would like to hear. George, this gem is in good hands.
URL:
http://ebay.com/
I tried to snipe this but was outsniped. It was stuck at $350.00 with about a minute left. I still think it was a good deal. It looks like an original twin to the Witcomb on the CR Whitcomb page here (right down to
the Shimano brakes, Avocet saddle and Suntour barcons):
http://classicrendezvous.com/
BTW, considering the role Witcomb USA played as an incubator for American frame-building talent shouldn't they have a status as perhaps an east coast Masi. Of course, they didn't have Faliero, Mario and the racing tradition but $526.52? C'mon! How about Sachs, Weigle and Chance?
George Allen Lexington, KY USA
Bill Kloos Law Office of Bill Kloos, PC 375 W. 4th Street, Suite 204 Eugene, OR 97401 Phone: (541) 343-8596 Fax: (541) 343-8702 e-mail: billkloos@landuseoregon.com Web http://www.LandUseOregon.com
-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of classicrendezvous-request@bikelist.org Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 3:50 PM To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: Classicrendezvous Digest, Vol 60, Issue 53
Send Classicrendezvous mailing list submissions to classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.bikelist.org/
You can reach the person managing the list at classicrendezvous-owner@bikelist.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Classicrendezvous digest..."
CR
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Why block chain? (ternst) 2. Re: 1984 Peugeot Questions (Fred Rednor) 3. Ebay Outing (Hilary Stone) 4. Taylor Bikes of Chicago (Tom Sanders) 5. WTT a 58 cm Concorde Astore for a 57-58 cm vintage bike (Philip W. Moore, Jr.) 6. Re: Why block chain? 7. Witcomb Bargain (George Allen) 8. Re: Witcomb Bargain (Jerome & Elizabeth Moos) 9. More NYC CL outness - Hetchins (Julian Shapiro) 10. Re: Witcomb Bargain (Fred Rednor) 11. that Hetchins listed on CL is on Dale's CR site too!!! (Kevin Kruger) 12. Re: Witcomb Bargain (Guy Apple)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:13:42 -0800 From: "ternst" <ternst1@cox.net> To: "ternst" <ternst1@cox.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, "John Betmanis" <johnb@oxford.net> Subject: Re: [CR]Why block chain? Message-ID: <008501c83cfb$7e19ff70$0300a8c0@D8XCLL51> References: <3.0.6.32.20071212094932.015981a0@mailhost.oxford.net> <006301c83cf7$a3a04f00$0300a8c0@D8XCLL51> Content-Type: text/plain;format=flowed;charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Message: 1
I knew something eluded me.
The metallic direct response feel was steel chain on steel chainring.
With the increasing usage of aluminum chainrings, that feel was about
half
diminished so that also aided the changeover to 1/2" pitch.
Ted Ernst
Palos Verdes Estates
CA USA
> One thing the guys didn't do was call you a blockhead if you rode a
> block chain.
> If you did you ended up in the ditch!
> Like mentioned both chain types were available as well as 1/2" for 100
> years or more.
> !/2 " did not come in block variety. Thats's why many people called
> the 1", skip tooth, or double link chains, because every other tooth
> was out, and the roller chains had two rollers close together.
> And the block was a block, but two rivets were close together and then
> the longer plate.
> Once you have ridden a block chain you will be a convert, if you are
> sensitive enough and appreciative of bike response and the difference
> in the direct feel to your legs.
> You get that direct metallic click in/to your legs, it's a feel like
> no other.( On the bike that is).
> That's why the track bike and it's response when you get off the seat,
> step on it, and whip the bike around either on the road or track is
> such a thrill, if your're into that kind of stuff.
> Age is no excuse, it's attitude that counts. YIPPIE, here I go!!
> If this is of no interest then shine on it, and go for the historic
> value only.
> The block chain was preferred by sprinters mostly thru the years
> because when you rode it, it had that "crisp", "snappy" feel
> especially when you jumped and accelerated quickly.
> True, you had less gear finesse selection, but the difference to
> sprinters and track riders was from 23-24-25 usually in one tooth
> jumps for gear selection and the half gear didn't seem to make enuf
difference.
> As time and mettalurgy progressed, the roller chains got better and as
> riding got more detailed, the 1/2" prevailed and started to replace
the 1"
> beginning in the later '50's in Europe and making it's way over here.
> The roller chain rolls much smoother and the added friction of the
> rollers didn't seem to matter as much in these newer years, so it was
> a combination of these factors that changed the equipment.
> Maybe I 'll think of more, if not, you can jump in the paceline and do
> your pull to help out with commentary.
> I rode my bike yesterday, going for a little run with Mary now, and
> tomorrow is a rest day, (Yard Work).
> Ted Ernst
> Palos Verdes Estates
> CA USA
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Betmanis" <johnb@oxford.net>
> To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:49 AM
> Subject: [CR]Why block chain?
>
>
>> I've been around vintage bikes for decades before they were ever
>> vintage, but I still don't know why block chains were used on old
track
bikes.
>> They
>> can't be stronger unless the side plates have more cross-section area
>> and I can't see how they could be smoother. The gear ratios available
>> are just half as many as with regular roller chains. So what's the
>> reason? Could it just be tradition, or that's how all chains were
>> before the roller chain was invented?
>>
>> John Betmanis
>> Woodstock, Ontario
>> Canada
>> _______________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:25:12 -0800 (PST) From: Fred Rednor <fred_rednor@yahoo.com> To: "classicrendezvous@bikelist.org" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Subject: Re: [CR]1984 Peugeot Questions Message-ID: <997291.37348.qm@web30605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <24145427.1197488249324.JavaMail.root@elwamui-royal.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: list
Message: 2
> I have a 1984 Peugeot PVS-10 that is in great shape, but I've decided
> to retire it as a regular rider/trainer.
> What was the correct white (actually, more off-white) bar wrap and how
> hard is it to find?
> The rear brake cable has a bit of rust at the rearmost cable guide. Is
> clear-coated brake cable housing still available?
> Also, the weinmann gum brake hoods are shot and I need to find some of
> those.
> There is a pair on Fleabay right now for $50. ouch.
>
> Early on, I had a set of wheels made up w/ Mavic MA-3's to replace the
> Mavic red-label tubulars that were on it. While I used a more modern
> Shimano 600 hub for the front, I re-used the rear Maillard for the
> rear. So I need a rim for the rear as well. Or, do I just run it as a
> PVSN-10? ; )
>
>
> The question is, is the bike really worth it to return it to original?
> The decals are in good shape and the paint (anthracite or Black
> Metalic) is good, but w/ some scratches only through to the white
> primer.
>
> What are your thoughts? I plan to hang the bike on a wall, but still
> ride it from time to time...
John,
Although your bike was actually built after the CR list's
1983 cut-off date, the PSV-10 frame and parts are all straight out of
1979,
if you know what I mean. It is also one of the greatest bicycle
bargains of
all time, so don't ever get rid it. The frame is nicely made and light
-
from Super Vitus tubing), derailleurs are the better Simplex pieces, and
the
crankset is Stronglight. (Or was it Nervar?) The brakes are kind of
cheap
but, in my experience, work better than Campagnolo brakes from that era.
Plus, they're lighter.
Isn't the rear hub a Helicomatic unit, though? It's become difficult
to
find replacement freewheels for those. You MUST keep this bike, clean
it up
and ride it!
As for bar tape, it was similar to the stuff sold by Bike Ribbon -
i.e.
faux leather - and might actually have been Bike Ribbon. Anyway, you
can
still get the stuff from your local bike shop, or here:
http://www.bikemannetwork.com/
_________________________________________________________________________
___
________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:57:43 +0000 From: Hilary Stone <hilary.stone@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Classicrendezvous <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Subject: [CR] Ebay Outing Message-ID: <47604B47.5030906@blueyonder.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: list Message: 3
Below is a list of items which I've put up on Ebay. For a change this week there are some earlier British frames both the Hawkes and the Gillott are especially nice. And the Armstrong is a very good example of a just pre-war top quality frame from a medium sized maker built with continental lugs (these are featured in the Brown Bros 1938 catalogue and I think may be an early lug design from Ekla - the forks are pure Russ design - which in their original type used round blades - confirmation of the date came from the Williams C1000 chainset dated 1938. But the special star of the week, the Pegoretti frame is off topic though steel... There are some other lovely parts and accessories too - the Major Taylor stem, Campag Record 36H large flange hubs, a gear sided Airlite large flange rear hub in very nice condition, NOS Sturmey 3/4spd trigger from the late 40s early 50s, Hobbs Lytalloy brake callipers, a really nice Reynolds aluminium seatpost, Universal Extra deep drop brake callipers and Weinmann Alesa 27in rims in both 36H or 32/40H versions and set of silver anodised Mavic MA2 36H rims... For those interested in British cycle racing history Ride and Be Dammed is an essential detailing the trials and tribulations of the BLRC the body that introduced proper road racing in the UK; additionlly the book has lots of great photos and is beautifully designed...
The auctions finish on Sunday as usual and all are best found using my ebay identity hilarystone or go to:
http://search.ebay.co.uk/
Hilary Stone, Bristol, England
=09 ARMSTRONG CLUBMANS FRAME Russ forks 1938 Reynolds 531
RALEIGH SIGN 1980s Burner Team Banana 75 x 20cm
HAWKES 24in FRAME c1939 Chater lugs Beautiful forks
COLNAGO 2006 DEALER CATALOGUE includes Ferrari models
OLMO PVC HANDLEBAR TAPE NOS NIB 1960s
CAMPAGNOLO CROCE DAUNE CHAINSET 52/39T c1989
TANDEM SEATPOST 26.4mm seatpost 1930s
CINELLI UNICANITOR No 4 SADDLE 1970s
UNIVERSAL EXTRA BRAKE CALLIPERS Early 1950s Deep drop
HOBBS LYTALLOY BRAKE CALLIPERS 1940s
CAMPAGNOLO RECORD LARGE FLANGE 36H HUBS 6-spd 60s/70s
GILLOTT 23in ROAD FRAME 1947 A Rare early Gillott
CAMPAGNOLO KIT BAG 1980s
SR RANDONNEUR BARS 1970s/80s
MIDDLEBURN ROAD CRANKSET 130mm bcd 180mm 405g c1994
CAMPAGNOLO C-RECORD CRANKSET 175mm c1988
STURMEY ARCHER 4-SPD TRIGGER c1950 NOS
CINELLI 1A 9cm STEM 1980s
STRONGLIGHT MYGAL TRACK CRANKSET 165mm Unused
LUCAS MILEOMETER for 26in wheels NOS
CAMPAGNOLO C-RECORD SEATPOST 26.8mm seatpin c1988
RALEIGH TRACK FRAME 21·5in 1972 ex Ian White, etc
CAMPAGNOLO SAFETY VEST
SIMPLEX DOUBLE SHIFTER PARTS c1953
MAILLARD 700 36H LARGE FLANGE FRONT HUB SPIDEL NOS 1980
SIMPLEX WHEEL STOPS NOS 1940s/50s
CAMPAGNOLO TRIOMPHE PEDALS c1987 suitable for wide shoe
STRONGLIGHT 100 CHAINSET 44/28T 170mm 1980s
CYCLO LEVER w THUMB DAMPER for STANDARD GEAR very rare =09 BROOKS B17 NARROW 1970s/80s
PEUGEOT 753 ROAD FRAME c1986 54cm
TA VEGA CHAINSET 165mm cranks 130mm bcd 48/38T NOS
SIMPLEX COMPETITION ROD FRONT GEAR c1949
LUCAS MILEOMETER for 27in wheels NOS NIB
REYNOLDS NO 5 SEATPOST 1930s/50s 27.2mm
CAMPAGNOLO SUPER RECORD SEATPOST 27.0mm seatpin
1950s/60s ALUMINIUM PING BELL as used by time triallist =09 CINELLI XA 12cm STEM 1990s excellent
AIRLITE LARGE FLANGE GEAR REAR HUB 40H Rare
PEGORETTI FRAME 55cm exItalian Pro 1994 Air brush paint
SABA HAIRNET HELMET size 57 (7) NOS
BRITISH LEATHER CYCLE SHOES 9.5 UK, 10 US, 44
MAJOR TAYLOR STEM 1930s-50s For tandem or solo
ARIUS PRESTIGE PERFORATED SADDLE 1970s/80s
MILREMO SADDLE 1970s
CINELLI 66 BARS 40cm Early 1970s 3 ring
RIDE AND BE DAMMED British Road Race History 1940s/50s
TA AXIX CARTRIDGE BEARING BOTTOM BRACKET 110mm NOS NIB
ROTRAX CYCLES MUSETTE 1970s
HEADCLIP TYPE HANDLEBAR CLIP No extension 1930s
LYOTARD 45CA QUILL PEDALS 1950s/60s
1940s BRITISH 3-ARM CRANKS takes Williams chainrings
MILREMO 5-PIN CRANKS for TA BSA Stronglight Williams
CINELLI 65 CRITERIUM BARS 42cm 1980s
F H GRUBB HEAD BADGE 1930s
ZEUS FRONT TRACK HUB 32H
REGINA EXTRA 13-21T 5-SPEED FREEWHEEL NOS
CLEMENT/CAMPAGNOLO TYRE PRESSURE GAUGE
ITM SUPER PRO 260 BARS 42cm wide 26.0mm
WEINMANN ALESA 27 x 1 1/4in rims 36H Excellent
MAVIC MA2 700C 36H Rare Argent type almost unused
CINELLI 1A 9.5cm STEM 1970s =09 CYCLISME 1960 French Racing 1959 =09 WEINMANN 730 BRAKESET NOS NIB early 1970s =09 TERRYS STOP WATCH CLIP 1950s/60s
OMAS TITANIUM BOTTOM BRACKET 1970s =09 CAMPAGNOLO ATB SEATPIN PARTS NOS 26.6mm =09 ITM ECLIPSE 13cm STEM 1990s 1in quill =09 WEINMANN ALESA 27 x 1 1/4in rims 32/40H Excellent =09 MAFAC CANTILEVER DRIVER ARMS c1960
CINELLI 1A 8cm STEM 1980s
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:13:24 -0500 From: "Tom Sanders" <tsan7759142@sbcglobal.net> To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Subject: [CR]Taylor Bikes of Chicago Message-ID: <003701c83d03$d52fb950$7f8f2bf0$@net> Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Message: 4
I walked into a friend's place today and he has a vintage trike sitting there. It is a Taylor. I remarked that it must be British and he told me that this was a Chicago company. It is a 1952 with sort of Art Deco lines to it and an inch pitch chain! Supposedly it cost over $100 in 1952. Does anyone know of a Taylor that was made in Chicago? My impression is that it may have been a Schwinn competitor. New one on me.
Tom Sanders
Lansing, MI USA
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:16:56 -0600 From: "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <philip_w_moore_jr@hotmail.com> To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Subject: [CR]WTT a 58 cm Concorde Astore for a 57-58 cm vintage bike Message-ID: <BAY113-DAV158C2F1B98EB2730EAE31F81650@phx.gbl> Message-ID: <2C1FD96BBD2B4CA0B5857E961A4AFB30@PhilipWMoorePC> In-Reply-To: <MONKEYFOODKu6PqmUfU0000490b@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org> References: <MONKEYFOODKu6PqmUfU0000490b@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org> Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Message: 5
Listmates:
I have a 58 cm Concorde Astore (circa 199that I am interested in trading for a complete CR-era bike with Nuovo Record or Super Record components. More on what I want for my bike will follow the description of my bike.
My bike is a 58 cm, and is equipped with mostly Chorus parts (including the shifters, which have the diagonal grooves in the levers and do not bear the Chorus label and the pretty, albeit weak, monoplaner brakes) and some Athena parts (I will need your help verifying which parts are Athena). The bike has 175 cranks with 53/39 rings, a 140 mm Cinelli stem, Cinelli 66-44 bars, a modern American Classic Seatpost, and a modern Selle San Marco saddle that looks like an Aspide (a/k/a sit-bone splitter) that I snagged from a saddle bin at my LBS (it was taken off a stock bike or traded for a saddle that fit somebody better). Note: when I bought the bike, it came without a saddle and with a straight-up f-u-g-l-y seatpost that must have been taken off a Huffy that was not made by Ben Serotta. I will toss in two silver bottle cages that will hold water bottles but that look like they were fashioned from recycles coat hangers.
I bought this bike cheap because it sat around forever and had to be completely tuned-up (done by my LBS; I'm mechanically retarded, err, challenged). The housing was replaced by my LBS, but I have a set of brand-new Campy cables that I'll pass along at my cost (close to wholesale).
The bike is clean, but does look like it was ridden. I would rate the bike as 10/10 mechanically (an honest and objective evaluation), 7.5/10 cosmetically (irrespective of the bike's vintage, but not a purely objective evaluation) and about an 8/10 in terms of its condition, all things considered (objective and subjective). I can send pictures of my bike to your email address should you ask me to do so privately (i.e. not through the listserver), but I will have to take them first. In any event, I will let the pictures do the rest of the talking.
Now what I want it return for my bike and (perhaps) some cash. As I said, I want a CR-era and CR-equipped (i.e. with NR or SR) bike, 57-58 cm in size, that's in a condition comparable to how I described that of my Concorde. With that said, I don't expect your cherry Legnano or anything, and might settle for a decent Raleigh Professional or something similar. Actually, a Ron Cooper is what I really want!
A brief apology: the last time I posted, I offered a chrome fork for sale. A friend of mine managed to break its crown (near the steering tube). I am sorry for the lack of communication to those of you who expressed interest in the fork.
Regards,
Philip W. Moore, Jr. Frisco, Texas, U.S.A. (469) 323-0832
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:32:23 -0500 From: genediggs@aol.com To: ternst1@cox.net, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org, johnb@oxford.net Subject: Re: [CR]Why block chain? Message-ID: <8CA0B1D9E49F402-894-699C@MBLK-M06.sysops.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <008501c83cfb$7e19ff70$0300a8c0@D8XCLL51> References: <3.0.6.32.20071212094932.015981a0@mailhost.oxford.net> <006301c83cf7$a3a04f00$0300a8c0@D8XCLL51> <008501c83cfb$7e19ff70$0300a8c0@D8XCLL51> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: list Message: 6
Ted and list members: I am a year or two younger than Ted but we rode in same races a half a dozen times a summer back in the fifties and sixties. A lot of them were in city parks with a mile or shorter circuit but usually ridden on track bikes. The program was a couple of short scratch races and then a ten or twenty mile points race. I must admit I would try and catch Ted's wheel in a sprint, not to pass him at the line, but just stay with him and hopefully be in the top ten and win a trophy. That's what we rode for back in those days. I still have my last Paramount tack bike (see #389 on the Fixed Gear Gallery) I think it was the last year that Paramount's came with inch pitch and block chains as standard equipment.
Gene Diggs Rochester Hills , MI, USA
-----Original Message----- From: ternst <ternst1@cox.net> To: ternst <ternst1@cox.net>; classicrendezvous@bikelist.org; John Betmanis <johnb@oxford.net> Sent: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 3:13 pm Subject: Re: [CR]Why block chain?
I knew something eluded me.Â
The metallic direct response feel was steel chain on steel chainring.Â
With the increasing usage of aluminum chainrings, that feel was about half diminished so that also aided the changeover to 1/2" pitch.Â
Ted ErnstÂ
Palos Verdes EstatesÂ
CA USAÂ
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>; "John Betmanis" <johnb@oxford.net>Â
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:46 AMÂ
Subject: Re: [CR]Why block chain? Â
> One thing the guys didn't do was call you a blockhead if you rode a
block
> chain.Â
> If you did you ended up in the ditch!Â
> Like mentioned both chain types were available as well as 1/2" for
100
> years or more.Â
> !/2 " did not come in block variety. Thats's why many people called
the
> 1", skip tooth, or double link chains, because every other tooth was
out,
> and the roller chains had two rollers close together.Â
> And the block was a block, but two rivets were close together and
then the
> longer plate.Â
> Once you have ridden a block chain you will be a convert, if you are
> sensitive enough and appreciative of bike response and the difference
in
> the direct feel to your legs.Â
> You get that direct metallic click in/to your legs, it's a feel like
no
> other.( On the bike that is).Â
> That's why the track bike and it's response when you get off the
seat,
> step on it, and whip the bike around either on the road or track is
such a
> thrill, if your're into that kind of stuff.Â
> Age is no excuse, it's attitude that counts. YIPPIE, here I go!!Â
> If this is of no interest then shine on it, and go for the historic
value
> only.Â
> The block chain was preferred by sprinters mostly thru the years
because
> when you rode it, it had that "crisp", "snappy" feel especially when
you
> jumped and accelerated quickly.Â
> True, you had less gear finesse selection, but the difference to
sprinters
> and track riders was from 23-24-25 usually in one tooth jumps for
gear
> selection and the half gear didn't seem to make enuf difference.Â
> As time and mettalurgy progressed, the roller chains got better and
as
> riding got more detailed, the 1/2" prevailed and started to replace
the 1"
> beginning in the later '50's in Europe and making it's way over
here.Â
> The roller chain rolls much smoother and the added friction of the
rollers
> didn't seem to matter as much in these newer years, so it was a
> combination of these factors that changed the equipment.Â
> Maybe I 'll think of more, if not, you can jump in the paceline and
do
> your pull to help out with commentary.Â
> I rode my bike yesterday, going for a little run with Mary now, and
> tomorrow is a rest day, (Yard Work).Â
> Ted ErnstÂ
> Palos Verdes EstatesÂ
> CA USAÂ
>Â
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Betmanis" <johnb@oxford.net>Â
> To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>Â
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:49 AMÂ
> Subject: [CR]Why block chain?Â
>Â
>Â
>> I've been around vintage bikes for decades before they were ever
vintage,Â
>> but I still don't know why block chains were used on old track
bikes.
>> TheyÂ
>> can't be stronger unless the side plates have more cross-section
area and
>> IÂ
>> can't see how they could be smoother. The gear ratios available are
justÂ
>> half as many as with regular roller chains. So what's the reason?
Could
>> itÂ
>> just be tradition, or that's how all chains were before the roller
chainÂ
>> was invented?Â
>>Â
>> John BetmanisÂ
>> Woodstock, OntarioÂ
>> CanadaÂ
>> _______________________________________________Â
>> Classicrendezvous mailing listÂ
>> Classicrendezvous@bikelist.orgÂ
>> http://www.bikelist.org/
>Â
> _______________________________________________Â
> Classicrendezvous mailing listÂ
> Classicrendezvous@bikelist.orgÂ
> http://www.bikelist.org/
_______________________________________________Â
Classicrendezvous mailing listÂ
Classicrendezvous@bikelist.orgÂ
http://www.bikelist.org/
________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com ------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:37:57 -0500 From: George Allen <jgallen@lexairinc.com> To: CR Mailing List <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Subject: [CR]Witcomb Bargain Message-ID: <476054B5.3000602@lexairinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Message: 7
URL:
http://ebay.com/
I tried to snipe this but was outsniped. It was stuck at $350.00 with about a minute left. I still think it was a good deal. It looks like an original twin to the Witcomb on the CR Whitcomb page here (right down to
the Shimano brakes, Avocet saddle and Suntour barcons):
http://classicrendezvous.com/
BTW, considering the role Witcomb USA played as an incubator for American frame-building talent shouldn't they have a status as perhaps an east coast Masi. Of course, they didn't have Faliero, Mario and the racing tradition but $526.52? C'mon! How about Sachs, Weigle and Chance?
George Allen Lexington, KY USA
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:08:04 -0800 (PST) From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net> To: George Allen <jgallen@lexairinc.com>, CR Mailing List <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Subject: Re: [CR]Witcomb Bargain Message-ID: <693161.278.qm@web82203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <476054B5.3000602@lexairinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: list Message: 8
I've always thought a large part of the Masi, or at least CA Masi, mystic was the tragic and compelling story of Mario Confente.
Unfortunately for the price of USA Witcombs, but extremely fortunately for the classic bike community, Messrs. Sachs, Weigle and, AFAIK, Chance are very much alive and well.
Regards,
Jerry Moos Big Spring, TX
George Allen <jgallen@lexairinc.com> wrote:
URL:
http://ebay.com/
I tried to snipe this but was outsniped. It was stuck at $350.00 with about a minute left. I still think it was a good deal. It looks like an original twin to the Witcomb on the CR Whitcomb page here (right down to
the Shimano brakes, Avocet saddle and Suntour barcons):
http://classicrendezvous.com/
BTW, considering the role Witcomb USA played as an incubator for American frame-building talent shouldn't they have a status as perhaps an east coast Masi. Of course, they didn't have Faliero, Mario and the racing tradition but $526.52? C'mon! How about Sachs, Weigle and Chance?
George Allen Lexington, KY USA
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
Classicrendezvous mailing list
Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
http://www.bikelist.org/
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:12:56 -0500 From: "Julian Shapiro" <julianshapiro@gmail.com> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: [CR]More NYC CL outness - Hetchins Message-ID: <2fc4467e0712121512q75559aeckd0fca191ceb552a4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Message: 9
In Manhattan, not Westchester, so not Eddie ( unless he's slumming)
Frame seems to have a semi-mysterious bike shop sticker....;-)
http://newyork.craigslist.org/
Julian Shapiro - waiting for the snow in Sag Harbor, NY
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:38:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Rednor <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Witcomb Bargain
Message-ID: <440550.43819.qm@web30608.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <693161.278.qm@web82203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: list
Message: 10
> I've always thought a large part of the Masi, or at least CA
> Masi, mystic was the tragic and compelling story of Mario
> Confente.
>
> Unfortunately for the price of USA Witcombs, but extremely
> fortunately for the classic bike community, Messrs. Sachs,
> Weigle and, AFAIK, Chance are very much alive and well.
One big difference is that the Italian Masis already had more cachet than the British Witcombs. In fact, I think it's caused a funny situation in the USA. That is, the status of British Witcombs has been raised, due to the later work and reputations of R. Sachs, P. Weigle and C. Chance. For Masi, the reverse is true - the "child" derives its reputation from the "parent". Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia (USA)
_________________________________________________________________________
___
________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:47:12 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Kruger <ktk1_7_0_2_8@yahoo.com> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org, oroboyz@aol.com Subject: [CR]that Hetchins listed on CL is on Dale's CR site too!!! Message-ID: <517803.87934.qm@web31412.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: list Message: 11
Maybe Dale can shed some light on the Hetchins just outed on Craigslist. More photos of what looks like the same bike appear on Dale's CR site (at least the couple of photos on the CL listing sure looked identical to those on the CR site!!!). Here's the address to the CR site photos:
http://www.classicrendezvous.com/
Nice looking bike, but dated earlier on Dale's site than what the CL seller claims???
Regards, Kevin Kruger - Grantville, PA
--------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:47:12 -0800 (GMT-08:00) From: Guy Apple <cinelliguy@earthlink.net> To: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>, George Allen <jgallen@lexairinc.com>, CR Mailing List <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Subject: Re: [CR]Witcomb Bargain Message-ID: <16462863.1197503232785.JavaMail.root@elwamui-cypress.atl.sa.earthlink.ne t> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Reply-To: Guy Apple <cinelliguy@earthlink.net> Message: 12
I would never part with my USA Witcomb for $600. Heck, I just spent $500 on special pano parts for it! Now way :-)
Guy Apple Palo Alto CA
-----Original Message-----
>From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
>Sent: Dec 12, 2007 3:08 PM
>To: George Allen <jgallen@lexairinc.com>, CR Mailing List
<classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
>Subject: Re: [CR]Witcomb Bargain
>
>I've always thought a large part of the Masi, or at least CA Masi,
mystic
was the tragic and compelling story of Mario Confente.
>
> Unfortunately for the price of USA Witcombs, but extremely
fortunately
for the classic bike community, Messrs. Sachs, Weigle and, AFAIK, Chance
are
very much alive and well.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry Moos
> Big Spring, TX
>
>George Allen <jgallen@lexairinc.com> wrote:
> URL:
>http://ebay.com/<blah>
&ssPage
Name=STRK:MEDW:IT&ih=010
>Ebay Item # : 200181167768
>
>I tried to snipe this but was outsniped. It was stuck at $350.00 with
>about a minute left. I still think it was a good deal. It looks like an
>original twin to the Witcomb on the CR Whitcomb page here (right down
to
>the Shimano brakes, Avocet saddle and Suntour barcons):
>
>http://classicrendezvous.com/USA/Witcomb_USA/Witcomb_JBZ.htm
>
>BTW, considering the role Witcomb USA played as an incubator for
>American frame-building talent shouldn't they have a status as perhaps
>an east coast Masi. Of course, they didn't have Faliero, Mario and the
>racing tradition but $526.52? C'mon! How about Sachs, Weigle and
Chance?
>
>George Allen
>Lexington, KY
>USA
>
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Classicrendezvous mailing list
>Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Classicrendezvous mailing list
>Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Classicrendezvous mailing list
Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
http://www.bikelist.org/
End of Classicrendezvous Digest, Vol 60, Issue 53 *************************************************
_______________________________________________
Classicrendezvous mailing list
Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
http://www.bikelist.org/