[CR]Why not Campagnolo?

(Example: Humor)

From: "Howard Darr" <hdarr@localnet.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <7d49b7530704250515q2c364886j143df0b9d5bc135@mail.gmail.com> <462F5533.1040808@burlingtontelecom.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:22:58 -0400
reply-type=response
Subject: [CR]Why not Campagnolo?

I know this is primarily a racing lightweight forum. However, for kids like myself growing up in the 70's who weren't primarily interested in racing it was a question of intended function.

I lusted after a TA triple crank for loaded touring. I remember going to the LBS that had Campagnolo brakes and took a look. Not enough whoa. I spent my money Weinmann brakes and put on rusty brake shoes with nifty fins.

Rear deraileur was easy for me a Shimano crane GS, shifted great and wrapped up yards of chain (not clunky looking like the suntour vgt either). I heard of the legendary cussing at the Gran Turismo and didn't hear of S. Wolfe untill I joined this list.

Shifters easy. Suntour Bar-cons.

Front Deraileur easy. Suntour first generation cyclone with the nifty cage extender. I later traded the cyclone for a NR front and decided I had made a bad trade. It wouldn't pick up the middle chain ring without shifting to the large one first.

First Generation ( I didn't know that was important then) dura ace hubs were very smooth and so much less to a kid who just paid for a Serotta frame it was hard to justify.

Pedals were kkt Pro ace with leather kkt straps. VERY NICE.

Seat Post was a SR copy of a simplex post. Solid and too cool at a very small fraction of a Campagnolo Post.

Howard Darr
Clymer PA