RE: [CR]Campy BB...Advice (And Parts) Wanted!

(Example: Framebuilders:Tubing:Columbus)

Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Fred Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: [CR]Campy BB...Advice (And Parts) Wanted!
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org, devotion finesse <devotion_finesse@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLU113-W37D86D3F4581C94123EF87F5360@phx.gbl>


Matthew, You can use the earlier derailleur with either the early or the later cr ank/spindle. The later derailleur requires the later crankarm; and the lat er crankarm, in turn, requires the later spindle. You can use the early crankarm with a later spindle, but the chainline w ill be shifted to the right by about 1.5mm. Actually, some early crankarms have had their mounting holes sufficiently stretched that the extra length of the later BB spindle will cause them to align perfectly. I hope this helped. Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia (USA)

--- On Mon, 10/13/08, devotion finesse <devotion_finesse@hotmail.com> wrote :
> From: devotion finesse <devotion_finesse@hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [CR]Campy BB...Advice (And Parts) Wanted!
> To: john@os2.dhs.org, "CR discussion list" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.or g>
> Date: Monday, October 13, 2008, 7:13 PM
> Dang. I knew there was some sort of pre/post CPSC issue that
> I would likely
> encounter...Just wasn't sure what.
> Does this mean that I will run into compatibility issues if
> I try to use a
> combination of pre and post CPSC bits? If, for instance, I
> were to use
> a pre-CPSC bottom bracket and front derailleur, will the
> crank arms also
> need to be pre-CPSC?
> Thanks for your help,
> Matthew Bowne
> Brooklyn, New York
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:03:31 -0500
> > From: john@os2.dhs.org
> > To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> > Subject: Re: [CR]Campy BB...Advice (And Parts) Wanted!
> >
> > devotion finesse wrote:
> >
> >> One of the final remaining bits needed to get my
> recently acquired '71 C
> oln
> >> ago Super on the road is an appropriate Nuovo
> Record bottom bracket.
> >> To the best of my knowledge, I ought to be on the
> lookout for a 70-SS-
> 120
> >> spindle. Can anyone tell me if it is critical
> that I find one from rou
> ghl
> >> y the same era that the bike was produced? Were
> there changes made to th
> e s
> >> pindle length in later years of production? Will
> I run into problems if
> ,
> >> say, I put an 80's NR spindle in?
> >
> > Yes. As a result of CPSC rule changes around 1977,
> Campy redesigned
> > their front derailleurs and drive side crank arms, and
> the spindle
> > length had to change to accommodate this. IIRC, the
> Campy Only web site
> > has a time line that might provide more detail.
> >
> > --
> > John Thompson (john@os2.dhs.org)
> > Appleton WI USA
> > _______________________________________________
> > Classicrendezvous mailing list
> > Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> >
> http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn \u201c10 hidden
> secrets\u201d from Jamie
> .
> http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns !5
> 50F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008
> _______________________________________________
> Classicrendezvous mailing list
> Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous

_______________________________________________ Classicrendezvous mailing list Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous