Re: [CR]Davidson v. Richard Sachs

(Example: Racing:Jean Robic)

Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:05:43 -0400
From: "Michael Schmidt" <mdschmidt56@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Davidson v. Richard Sachs
In-reply-to: <BB49EED8A19A4AD1A740623D5A351A88@gatewaygpcezcz>
To: Charles F Nighbor <cnighbor1@comcast.net>, Untitled <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Thread-topic: [CR]Davidson v. Richard Sachs
Thread-index: Ack8XTg+dpETRqhQEd26pAAWy8lbaw==


Charles writes: " A Davidson fan!! Better than a Richard Sachs in my opinion"

Really, In what way, Charlie? Design? workmanship? Ride Quality? Paint? Curb appeal?, the ability to attract the opposite sex? That is a pretty interesting statement that you've just made. Permit me to disagree.

Charlie, I think the Sachs and Davidson are two different kinds of bikes. The Sachs is a racing bike. I see the Davidson as more of an all around bike. I have ridden both bikes and I know both builders and they are excellent craftsmen in their own right. Atmo!

Mike Schmidt "Not a Charlie Nighbor fan" Stirling, NJ USA

On 11/1/08 2:02 PM, "Charles F Nighbor" <cnighbor1@comcast.net> wrote:
> Davidson Custom Steel (56 cm - Dura Ace 9-speed) Item number:
> 180302477702
>
> On eBay ending Nov 1 18:42:55 PDT
> Looks great for price
> Two others on eBay now
> A Davidson fan!! Better than a Richard Sachs in my opinion and I own
> both
> Not Seller
> Charles Nighbor
> Walnut Creek, CA USA