Re: [CR] The Alex Singer on French Ebay

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing:Falck)

From: "Kai Hilbertz" <khilbertz@googlemail.com>
To: Jan Heine <heine94@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <a062309c3c5a054136c04@[192.168.1.33]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:37:48 +0100
References: <355694.35008.qm@web44913.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <a062309abc59f0859ac59@[192.168.1.33]> <68883C0C-F54D-49DE-8D85-E507EE2C38AC@cadre.org> <a062309b8c59f9ff63532@[192.168.1.33]> <0C06264E-3AEC-4314-B463-1A18489525AA@gmail.com> <a062309c1c59fbe9361d7@[192.168.1.33]> <E2B44E92-8FBF-40FE-B721-23DE8E74B883@gmail.com>
Cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] The Alex Singer on French Ebay


Jan. 24, 09

Hello Jan, cc List,

do you personally prefer 48/32, as stated? That would mean a BCD of 94 (or smaller), and then you could go smaller with the inner chainring. Or were you referring to 48/33 or 48/34 with a BCD of 110? What do you use in the rear?

Greets

Kai Hilbertz Munich, Germany
> My Alex Singer was designed for a different rider who specified a
> 52-42-32 triple, but I prefer a 48-32 compact double,

On 24.01.2009, at 06:28, Jan Heine wrote:
> Just as a by the way, you still can change the front chainring size
> by 2-4 teeth without problems, because the diameter of those rings
> doesn't vary that much. (4 teeth out of 50 is only 8%.) Considering
> that most Singers were originally set up for 50-tooth or 48-tooth
> chainrings, it appears unlikely that you'd need to change them by
> much more than that.
>
> Jan Heine
> Editor
> Bicycle Quarterly
> 140 Lakeside Ave #C
> Seattle WA 98122
> http://www.vintagebicyclepress.com