[CR] Vigilante topic policing

Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:24:44 -0400
From: "John Betmanis" <johnb@oxford.net>
To: CR List <ClassicRendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <718391.27211.qm@web33104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1256781402.4ae8f65ad9d90@www.mrrabbit.net> <75d04b480910291051p3890bb1cvd168edde5ecfeb43@mail.gmail.com> <1256841382.4ae9e0a6db4db@www.mrrabbit.net>
In-Reply-To: <1256841382.4ae9e0a6db4db@www.mrrabbit.net>
Subject: [CR] Vigilante topic policing

But that's the whole point. If everybody and his brother started policing messages according to their own interpretation of the list rules, the volume of the list could double. Let's leave it to Dale to deal with.

mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net wrote:
> Feel free to tell Dale the same...
>
> =8-)
>
> Robert Shackelford
> San Jose, CA USA
>
>
>
>
> Quoting Kurt Sperry <haxixe@gmail.com>:
>
>
>> These posts to the list declaring something to be off-topic are
>> absolutely off-topic, obviously having far less to do with vintage
>> lightweight bicycles than the posts they are commenting on.
>>
>> (Irony intentional)
>>
>> Kurt Sperry
>> Bellingham, Washington
>> USA
>>
>> 2009/10/28 <mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net>:
>>
>>> This is pretty much off topic...
>>>
>>
>

--
John Betmanis Woodstock, Ontario Canada