Re: [CR] restoration is a tough business

(Example: Framebuilders)

In-Reply-To: <d0489a0bd8d93ba3f43fa99f3ce5cd6c@sbcglobal.net>
References: <20091113.002918.20836.0@webmail08.vgs.untd.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:52:52 -0500
From: "Ken Freeman" <kenfreeman096@gmail.com>
To: Phil Brown <philcycles@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] restoration is a tough business


Back to the perspective of vintage racing bikes as "tools for racing," not high-end gourmet showpieces.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Phil Brown <philcycles@sbcglobal.net>wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 12:29 AM, brianbaylis@juno.com wrote:
>
> The main reason the file marks are so obvious on Cinelli BB shells is
>> first, they are sand cast shells which are rough to begin with, so what
>> doesn't get filed is still rough; and what does get filed is only done with
>> bastard files, BIG ones! They apparently never heard of 2nd cut or smooth
>> cut files in Italian bike factories.
>>
>
> In those glorious days of yore I bought bottom bracket shells from Cinelli
> and I can testify that they were sand cast and rough. I'm afraid a modern
> builder would run screaming from the room at the very sight of one.
> Phil Brown
> Examining one like Yorick's skull in Oakland, Calif.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>

--
Ken Freeman
Ann Arbor, MI USA