[CR] Fwd: NOS the TRUE value?

(Example: Framebuilding:Norris Lockley)

In-Reply-To: <9301197C-C70C-400E-8194-A4A81ACC9A95@velostuf.com>
References: <9301197C-C70C-400E-8194-A4A81ACC9A95@velostuf.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:24:26 -0500
From: "Angel Garcia" <veronaman@gmail.com>
To: CLASSIC RENDEZVOUS <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: [CR] Fwd: NOS the TRUE value?


I was aggravated.

Angel Garcia Long Valley NJ

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: John Barron <john@velostuf.com> Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:18 PM Subject: Re: [CR] NOS the TRUE value? To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Does anyone else get aggravated that we have members on this list who declare what other people should and shouldn't do with their bikes/parts?

I'm going to suggest that everyone talk freely about how *they* themselves like to manage their bikes and parts, and accept wholly what everyone else does with *their* bikes and parts... It feels so much less collegial to me when people follow this path.

I have bikes that I ride, and I have bikes that I hang on the wall, thank you very much. To suggest that I am somehow being delinquent in my duty as custodian of that bike by not riding it is, well... self-righteous. I feel like I do a lot for this hobby, and I hate it when I feel like I have defend my choices.

John Barron Minneapolis MN USA

_______________________________________________

--
You may enjoy reading my blog:
http://www.italiancyclingjournal.blogspot.com